Paying a excessive worth for victory

0
18


The Los Angeles Dodgers are an important staff, however they’re not very environment friendly.

The Dodgers are on monitor to win greater than 110 video games this season. That’s an unimaginable feat, one beforehand completed by solely 4 golf equipment in 151 years of big-league baseball.

However the staff is paying an awfully excessive worth for victory. The Dodgers’ estimated payroll for 2022, according to Baseball Reference, is $289.31 million. That’s roughly $50 million past the runner-up in complete spending, the New York Yankees at $238.95 million.

Solely two different groups have payrolls above $200 million — the New York Mets and Philadelphia Phillies — whereas eight golf equipment are within the vary between $150 million and $199 million.

However these figures replicate solely the full quantity spent. What’s extra attention-grabbing is the return that every staff is receiving on its funding, which will be simply calculated by evaluating payroll {dollars} and wins.

The 2022 season isn’t fairly over, after all, so I projected every staff’s document on September 11 to a full 162-game schedule. The Dodgers, for instance, are on tempo for 111.5 regular-season victories.

The remaining math is sort of easy. Take the payroll for a given staff ($289.31 million for the Dodgers), divide that determine by projected wins (111.5), and also you wind up with a ratio of {dollars} per win. The Dodgers’ ratio of $2,595,000 per victory is the very best — and therefore essentially the most inefficient — within the majors this yr.

The neighboring Los Angeles Angels rank second-worst within the effectivity standings. They don’t spend as a lot because the Dodgers, nor do they fare as properly on the sphere. The Angels’ ratio works out to $2,490,000 per win.

Rounding out the record of the 5 most inefficient franchises are the Yankees, Boston Pink Sox, and Phillies.

The undisputed effectivity champions of 2022, then again, are the Baltimore Orioles, who’ve shocked most observers with their sharp play within the wake of 5 consecutive shedding seasons. The Orioles are on monitor to win 85.1 video games with a complete payroll of $48.00 million, spending simply $564,000 per victory.

5 different golf equipment are spending lower than $1 million per win. They’re — in effectivity order behind the Orioles — the runner-up Pittsburgh Pirates, Cleveland Guardians, Seattle Mariners, Oakland Athletics, and Tampa Bay Rays.

The effectivity standings observe, with groups ranked from most to least environment friendly. Every membership is listed with its complete payroll (thanks again to Baseball Reference), projected wins, and payroll per win. The staff’s rank in every class (amongst all 30 big-league golf equipment) is proven in parentheses. (The best payroll, most projected wins, and lowest payroll-per-win ratio are assigned first place in these respective classes.)

A brand new installment will arrive in your e-mail every Tuesday and Friday morning

  • Complete payroll: $48,000,000 (rank: 29 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 85.1 (rank: 13 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $564,000 (rank: 1 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $37,925,000 (rank: 30 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 59.9 (rank: 28 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $633,000 (rank: 2 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $65,960,000 (rank: 27 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 85.1 (rank: 13 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $775,000 (rank: 3 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $78,285,000 (rank: 25 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 90.9 (rank: 9 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $861,000 (rank: 4 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $50,248,334 (rank: 28 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 57.9 (rank: 29 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $868,000 (rank: 5 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $86,104,211 (rank: 23 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 92.2 (rank: 7 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $934,000 (rank: 6 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $68,200,000 (rank: 26 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 66.9 (rank: 24 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,019,000 (rank: 7 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $78,860,000 (rank: 24 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 76.3 (rank: 19 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,034,000 (rank: 8 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $110,792,857 (rank: 21 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 81.0 (rank: 16 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,368,000 (rank: 9 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $94,410,000 (rank: 22 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 64.8 (rank: 26 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,457,000 (rank: 10 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $128,421,127 (rank: 15 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 85.6 (rank: 12 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,500,000 (rank: 11 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $164,789,600 (rank: 9 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 103.7 (rank: 2 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,589,000 (rank: 12 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $112,605,000 (rank: 19 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 70.6 (rank: 21 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,595,000 (rank: 13 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $156,814,666 (rank: 12 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 94.9 (rank: 6 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,652,000 (rank: 14 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $171,075,000 (rank: 7 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 101.4 (rank: 4 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,687,000 (rank: 15 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $111,882,381 (rank: 20 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 66.2 (rank: 25 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,690,000 (rank: 16 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $120,176,667 (rank: 17 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 69.3 (rank: 22 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,734,000 (rank: 17 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $134,929,667 (rank: 13 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 76.9 (rank: 18 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,755,000 (rank: 18 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $158,334,158 (rank: 11 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 89.1 (rank: 11 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,777,000 (rank: 19 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $165,705,857 (rank: 8 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 91.6 (rank: 8 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,809,000 (rank: 20 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $117,240,000 (rank: 18 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 62.9 (rank: 27 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,864,000 (rank: 21 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $131,085,000 (rank: 14 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 67.6 (rank: 23 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,939,000 (rank: 22 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $163,958,334 (rank: 10 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 83.3 (rank: 15 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $1,968,000 (rank: 23 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $125,051,666 (rank: 16 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 56.7 (rank: 30 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $2,205,000 (rank: 24 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $237,473,333 (rank: 3 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 101.8 (rank: 3 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $2,333,000 (rank: 25 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $209,488,461 (rank: 4 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 89.7 (rank: 10 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $2,335,000 (rank: 26 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $191,920,000 (rank: 5 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 78.7 (rank: 17 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $2,439,000 (rank: 27 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $238,950,714 (rank: 2 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 97.2 (rank: 5 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $2,458,000 (rank: 28 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $177,063,095 (rank: 6 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 71.1 (rank: 20 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $2,490,000 (rank: 29 of 30)

  • Complete payroll: $289,311,999 (rank: 1 of 30)

  • Projected wins: 111.5 (rank: 1 of 30)

  • Payroll per win: $2,595,000 (rank: 30 of 30)


Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here